Observed since 20 Oct, 20:02 UTC
No superseded metadata states collected. Unchanged observations do not create new revisions.
Sklearn compatiable model instance labelling tool to help validate models in situations involving data drift.
Adversarial labeller is a sklearn compatible labeller that scores instances as belonging to the test dataset or not to help model selection under data drift. Adversarial labeller is distributed under the MIT license.
Dependencies
Adversarial validator requires:
User installation
The easiest way to install adversarial validator is using
pip install adversarial_labeller
Example Usage
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.datasets.samples_generator import make_blobs
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from adversarial_labeller import AdversarialLabelerFactory, Scorer
scoring_metric = accuracy_score
# Our blob data generation parameters for this example
number_of_samples = 1000
number_of_test_samples = 300
# Generate 1d blob data and label a portion as test data
# ... 1d blob data can be visualized as a rug plot
variables, labels = \
make_blobs(
n_samples=number_of_samples,
centers=2,
n_features=1,
random_state=0
)
df = pd.DataFrame(
{
'independent_variable':variables.flatten(),
'dependent_variable': labels,
'label': 0 # default to train data
}
)
test_indices = df.index[-number_of_test_samples:]
train_indices = df.index[:-number_of_test_samples]
df.loc[test_indices,'label'] = 1 # ... now we mark instances that are test data
# Now perturb the test samples to simulate data drift/different test distribution
df.loc[test_indices, "independent_variable"] +=\
np.std(df.independent_variable)
# ... now we have an example of data drift where adversarial labeling can be used to better estimate the actual test accuracy
features_for_labeller = df.independent_variable
labels_for_labeller = df.label
pipeline, flip_binary_predictions =\
AdversarialLabelerFactory(
features = features_for_labeller,
labels = labels_for_labeller,
run_pipeline = False
).fit_with_best_params()
scorer = Scorer(the_scorer=pipeline,
flip_binary_predictions=flip_binary_predictions)
# Now we evaluate a classifer on training data only, but using
# our fancy adversarial labeller
_X = df.loc[train_indices]\
.independent_variable\
.values\
.reshape(-1,1)
_X_test = df.loc[test_indices]\
.independent_variable\
.values\
.reshape(-1,1)
# ... sklearn wants firmly defined shapes
clf_adver = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=1)
adversarial_scores =\
cross_val_score(
X=_X,
y=df.loc[train_indices].dependent_variable,
estimator=clf_adver,
scoring=scorer.grade,
cv=10,
n_jobs=-1,
verbose=1)
# ... and we get ~ 0.70 - 0.68
average_adversarial_score =\
np.array(adversarial_scores).mean()
# ... let's see how this compares with normal cross validation
clf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=1)
scores =\
cross_val_score(
X=_X,
y=df.loc[train_indices].dependent_variable,
estimator=clf,
cv=10,
n_jobs=-1,
verbose=1)
# ... and we get ~ 0.92
average_score =\
np.array(scores).mean()
# now let's see how this compares with the actual test score
clf_all = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=1)
clf_all.fit(_X,
df.loc[train_indices].dependent_variable)
# ... actual test score is 0.70
actual_score =\
accuracy_score(
clf_all.predict(_X_test),
df.loc[test_indices].dependent_variable
)
adversarial_result = abs(average_adversarial_score - actual_score)
print(f"... adversarial labelled cross validation was {adversarial_result:.2f} points different than actual.") # ... 0.00 - 0.02 points
cross_val_result = abs(average_score - actual_score)
print(f"... regular validation was {cross_val_result:.2f} points different than actual.") # ... 0.23 points
# See tests/ for additional examples, including against the Titanic and stock market trading
Download counts and popularity will appear here as the collector receives them.
| Version | Published | Direct dependencies | Open version |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.1.8 | 28 Dec 2019 | 40 |
This describes our collected data; it is not a security assessment.
Shared repository data · GitHub
Observed since 20 Oct, 20:02 UTC
No superseded metadata states collected. Unchanged observations do not create new revisions.
package:dc90bd2db4f9da84daff5d5257c6bee5e96a300e4a15e8c7a6666d06650e48ef