Catalog PyPI
PACKAGE EXPLORERView in registry

agentic-evalkit

PyPI

Evaluate agentic systems with reproducible, evidence-first grading.

agentsbenchmarkingevaluationllm
Versions collected1
Direct dependencies12From release 0.4.1
Last observed20 Oct, 22:15 UTC

README

Version 0.4.1 documentation

agentic-evalkit

agentic-evalkit grades AI agent output against checks you define, and writes up the evidence behind each score.

Use it from the command line or Python to run repeatable evaluations, apply objective checks, compare results, and generate reports for review. It can evaluate Python code, command-line programs, and HTTP services without tying them to a specific AI framework.

Objective checks run before optional model-based judging. The package includes tested support for calibrated judge evidence while leaving model-provider selection to the caller. The built-in reference judge always returns the same verdict for the same input, and it's advisory only; it cannot approve a release.

Why not promptfoo, Inspect, DeepEval, Braintrust, or LangSmith? Those tools handle the workflow side of evals — running lots of prompts, wiring checks into CI, tracking experiments over time. Use one of them for that. This package solves a narrower, stricter problem: trusting the result you get, and these are the controls agentic-evalkit itself enforces to do it, shipping as of the current release (0.4.1 on PyPI):

  • An AI judge has to prove it agrees with real human-labeled answers before it's allowed to approve anything
  • Two runs are only compared once we can prove they ran under matching conditions
  • A bug in your own code is never confused with the AI simply getting the answer wrong
  • A fuzzy AI opinion can never override a hard requirement like "the code must compile"
  • On grounded-citation tasks, a planted marker echoed back in an answer is caught before it inflates a score

A documentation review of promptfoo, Inspect, DeepEval, Braintrust, LangSmith, MLflow, and Langfuse's own primary docs (most recently 2026-08-04) found that none of them documents an equivalent control as a core concept. Exactly what was checked, on what date, what was not tested (no source audit was performed on any competing project), and where each of those tools is the better choice instead: docs/prior-art.md.

Start with the quickstart guide. Design boundaries: architecture specification.

Quickstart

pip install agentic-evalkit
agentic-evalkit doctor
agentic-evalkit init --preset gsm8k --output eval.yaml
agentic-evalkit run eval.yaml --limit 5 --yes

This resolves the curated GSM8K preset from Hugging Face, runs five samples through the packaged smoke target, grades them with a normalized exact-match grader, and writes a canonical JSON report. No importer code, manual dataset download, datasets, pyarrow, or Docker is required.

The run reports passed=0 failed=5 — that's expected, not a bug. The packaged demo target (zero_target) always answers "0", so it always fails GSM8K grading; the point of this walkthrough is to verify the pipeline — live dataset resolution, target execution, objective grading, and report generation — before you wire in a real system under test. See docs/guides/quickstart.md for the full walkthrough, including the standalone report command that regenerates a self-contained HTML report from that JSON. To see the report shape before installing anything, a real evaluation run's checked-in JSON/HTML/Markdown reports are at scripts/reports/2026-07-26-agent-workflow-eval/.

Python API

The CLI is built on a small, curated Python API for integrations that need more than the built-in presets: wrap your own system as a target, then describe a run with a typed manifest.

from agentic_evalkit import CallableTarget, DatasetRef, EvalRunManifest, EvalRunner

def my_system(sample_input: dict) -> dict:
    return {"answer": solve(sample_input["question"])}

target = CallableTarget(my_system, name="my-system")
manifest = EvalRunManifest(
    run_name="quickstart", adapter="gsm8k@1", grader="normalized-exact@1",
    target_name="my-system", dataset_ref=DatasetRef(provider="huggingface", dataset_id="openai/gsm8k"),
)

This snippet is abbreviated for brevity — it omits the catalog, adapter, grader, and artifact-store wiring a real run needs. See the HTTP agent example for the complete, runnable Python-API script.

EvalRunner(...).run(manifest) then drives dataset resolution, execution, and grading end to end. CallableTarget satisfies ExecutionTarget — agentic-evalkit's only system-under-test boundary — which is also exported at the top level for anyone implementing a custom target. Everything else — additional targets, graders, reporters, dataset providers, benchmark adapters, and statistics — is one import away under its own subpackage (agentic_evalkit.graders, agentic_evalkit.reporters, and so on).

Optional extras

agentic-evalkit declares four optional extras; the base install still ships without Docker or any model-provider SDK — see ADR-0009 for the extras policy.

  • swebench (pip install agentic-evalkit[swebench], pulling in swebench>=4.1,<5 and docker>=7.1,<8) backs SweBenchDockerHarnessExecutor, the container-based SWE-bench Verified harness executor landed in ADR-0014: with the extra installed and a reachable Docker daemon, swebench-harness@1 grades a real resolved/unresolved verdict instead of reporting unavailable.
  • claude (pip install agentic-evalkit[claude], pulling in claude-agent-sdk) backs ClaudeAgentTarget (ADR-0025), which grades Claude itself through a Claude subscription sign-in rather than an API key.
  • mlflow and langfuse (pip install agentic-evalkit[mlflow] or agentic-evalkit[langfuse]) back the calibration-gating bridges in the MLflow & Langfuse guide (ADR-0022).

Documentation

  • Quickstart — install to first report
  • CLI reference — commands, options, offline behavior, and exit codes
  • Providers — local formats, Hugging Face auth, cache/offline
  • Graders — objective-first order, hard gates, calibrated judges
  • Targets — callable, subprocess, HTTP, MCP-stdio, and Claude Agent SDK execution targets
  • SWE-bench — preview/prediction workflow and the harness boundary
  • HTTP agent example — evaluating a real HTTP agent endpoint
  • MLflow & Langfuse bridge — gate judge authority in MLflow and Langfuse without leaving either platform
  • Example report — a real 48-case run's write-up, with the canonical JSON/HTML/Markdown reports it came from

Repository boundary

This project imports no host-repo internals — systems are reached only through the public ExecutionTarget protocol (callable, subprocess, HTTP, MCP-stdio, or Claude Agent SDK adapters); see ADR-0001 and ADR-0006.

Downloads & popularity

Awaiting observations

No metric observations yet

Download counts and popularity will appear here as the collector receives them.

Versions 1

Collected releases
VersionPublishedDirect dependenciesOpen version
0.4.124 Sept 202612

Package advisories

0
No matching advisories collected

This describes our collected data; it is not a security assessment.

Repository

PENDING
tafreeman/agentic-evalkit

Shared repository data · GitHub

License detected in repository
Not collected

Metadata history

Meaningful changes
Current collected state Current

Observed since 20 Oct, 22:15 UTC

No superseded metadata states collected. Unchanged observations do not create new revisions.

Record identity

package:189ec95d4f5127f6cc3753474f56d86ef6996d52ba80605d3421c4109051d841