Observed since 20 Oct, 22:15 UTC
No superseded metadata states collected. Unchanged observations do not create new revisions.
Evaluate agentic systems with reproducible, evidence-first grading.
agentic-evalkit grades AI agent output against checks you define, and writes up the evidence behind each score.
Use it from the command line or Python to run repeatable evaluations, apply objective checks, compare results, and generate reports for review. It can evaluate Python code, command-line programs, and HTTP services without tying them to a specific AI framework.
Objective checks run before optional model-based judging. The package includes tested support for calibrated judge evidence while leaving model-provider selection to the caller. The built-in reference judge always returns the same verdict for the same input, and it's advisory only; it cannot approve a release.
Why not promptfoo, Inspect, DeepEval, Braintrust, or LangSmith?
Those tools handle the workflow side of evals — running lots of prompts,
wiring checks into CI, tracking experiments over time. Use one of them for
that. This package solves a narrower, stricter problem: trusting the
result you get, and these are the controls agentic-evalkit itself
enforces to do it, shipping as of the current release (0.4.1 on PyPI):
A documentation review of promptfoo, Inspect, DeepEval, Braintrust, LangSmith, MLflow, and Langfuse's own primary docs (most recently 2026-08-04) found that none of them documents an equivalent control as a core concept. Exactly what was checked, on what date, what was not tested (no source audit was performed on any competing project), and where each of those tools is the better choice instead: docs/prior-art.md.
Start with the quickstart guide. Design boundaries: architecture specification.
pip install agentic-evalkit
agentic-evalkit doctor
agentic-evalkit init --preset gsm8k --output eval.yaml
agentic-evalkit run eval.yaml --limit 5 --yes
This resolves the curated GSM8K preset from Hugging Face, runs five samples
through the packaged smoke target, grades them with a normalized exact-match
grader, and writes a canonical JSON report. No importer code, manual dataset
download, datasets, pyarrow, or Docker is required.
The run reports passed=0 failed=5 — that's expected, not a bug. The
packaged demo target (zero_target) always answers "0", so it always
fails GSM8K grading; the point of this walkthrough is to verify the
pipeline — live dataset resolution, target execution, objective grading,
and report generation — before you wire in a real system under test. See
docs/guides/quickstart.md for the full
walkthrough, including the standalone report command that regenerates a
self-contained HTML report from that JSON. To see the report shape before
installing anything, a real evaluation run's checked-in JSON/HTML/Markdown
reports are at
scripts/reports/2026-07-26-agent-workflow-eval/.
The CLI is built on a small, curated Python API for integrations that need more than the built-in presets: wrap your own system as a target, then describe a run with a typed manifest.
from agentic_evalkit import CallableTarget, DatasetRef, EvalRunManifest, EvalRunner
def my_system(sample_input: dict) -> dict:
return {"answer": solve(sample_input["question"])}
target = CallableTarget(my_system, name="my-system")
manifest = EvalRunManifest(
run_name="quickstart", adapter="gsm8k@1", grader="normalized-exact@1",
target_name="my-system", dataset_ref=DatasetRef(provider="huggingface", dataset_id="openai/gsm8k"),
)
This snippet is abbreviated for brevity — it omits the catalog, adapter, grader, and artifact-store wiring a real run needs. See the HTTP agent example for the complete, runnable Python-API script.
EvalRunner(...).run(manifest) then drives dataset resolution, execution,
and grading end to end. CallableTarget satisfies ExecutionTarget —
agentic-evalkit's only system-under-test boundary — which is also exported
at the top level for anyone implementing a custom target. Everything
else — additional targets, graders, reporters, dataset providers,
benchmark adapters, and statistics — is one import away under its own
subpackage (agentic_evalkit.graders, agentic_evalkit.reporters, and so
on).
agentic-evalkit declares four optional extras; the base install still
ships without Docker or any model-provider SDK — see
ADR-0009 for the
extras policy.
swebench (pip install agentic-evalkit[swebench], pulling in
swebench>=4.1,<5 and docker>=7.1,<8) backs
SweBenchDockerHarnessExecutor, the container-based SWE-bench Verified
harness executor landed in
ADR-0014: with the
extra installed and a reachable Docker daemon, swebench-harness@1 grades
a real resolved/unresolved verdict instead of reporting unavailable.claude (pip install agentic-evalkit[claude], pulling in
claude-agent-sdk) backs ClaudeAgentTarget
(ADR-0025), which
grades Claude itself through a Claude subscription sign-in rather than an
API key.mlflow and langfuse (pip install agentic-evalkit[mlflow] or
agentic-evalkit[langfuse]) back the calibration-gating bridges in
the MLflow & Langfuse guide
(ADR-0022).This project imports no host-repo internals — systems are reached only through the public ExecutionTarget protocol (callable, subprocess, HTTP, MCP-stdio, or Claude Agent SDK adapters); see ADR-0001 and ADR-0006.
Download counts and popularity will appear here as the collector receives them.
| Version | Published | Direct dependencies | Open version |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.4.1 | 24 Sept 2026 | 12 |
This describes our collected data; it is not a security assessment.
Observed since 20 Oct, 22:15 UTC
No superseded metadata states collected. Unchanged observations do not create new revisions.
package:189ec95d4f5127f6cc3753474f56d86ef6996d52ba80605d3421c4109051d841